Charlie Kirk’s Assassination: A Two Kingdom Call to Action

Word from the Center
Written By Dr. Gregory Seltz

This October, stand firm in the faith handed down from the Reformation. Help support our efforts to contend for the freedom to proclaim the faith in this generation too.

Click here to learn more or to donate.

As I’ve shared online, for the last few days I’ve been laboring to write a response to the political assassination of Charlie Kirk, trying to put words together that express a proper response to the shock and horror of the evil violence perpetrated against a Christian believer who understood the limitations of politics and the beautiful salvation message that only God could accomplish in Jesus. A person who was willing to dialogue and debate all comers in the hope of demonstrating the truth of what he said and believed. He was proud of the foundational principles of individual liberty, religious freedom, limited government, educational freedom/choice, and the importance of faith, family, freedom to live self-governed lives . . . and for that he was executed. That should truly shock us all to our core.

But even if that “shock” occurs, I believe that we are at a moment in time where also lack the critical thinking skills to determine how to move forward on this.[1] The cries are already ringing out for “tolerance, tolerance, tolerance,” but that is how we got here in the first place. I wrote back in 2018 about a disturbing trend to identify conservative, confessional Christians as “intolerant,” those who are the same as the Taliban or the radical Jihadists. Listen to these words again, spoken not by some obscure “youtuber” or “social media influencer” but from Robert Reich, former Labor Secretary for President Bill Clinton. He said, 

The true battle (of the 21st Century) will be between the modern society and the anti-modernists; between those who believe in the primacy of the individual and those who believe that human beings owe their allegiance and identity to a higher authority; between those who give priority to life in this world and those who believe that human life is a mere preparation for existence beyond life; between those who believe in science, reason, and logic and those who believe that truth is revealed through Scripture and religious dogma; Terrorism will disrupt and destroy lives. But it is not the greatest danger that we face.”[2]

Did you hear what he said? Did you hear any “tolerance” in Reich’s words? Of course not. But many don’t hear the horror of his words either because the propaganda is already doing its work. In his book Christianity in an Age of Terrorism, Gene Veith warned of this false labeling already in 2002:

Nevertheless, like interfaith theologians, militant secularists lump together conservative Christians with the Muslim terrorists as “fundamentalists,” as the enemy who deserves to be eradicated.

Those who flew the planes into the buildings on 9/11 are the same as those who believe confidently, courageously that—the Bible is God’s Word, that marriage is between a man and a woman, that innocent human life in the womb should be protected/not killed, that parents have the right and the responsibility to educate their children, that law and order is the main work of government . . . namely the protecting of innocent citizen’s lives and property.

Yes, those who believe that humans are “created in the image of God,” [3]who think that there are universal, moral principles that are reflected in the lives, cultures, and even religions of virtually every human being on earth, yes, they are the same as the Taliban, the terrorists.

And what do you do with terrorists?

You demonize them, ostracize them, deplatform them, and if that doesn’t work, you arrest them and kill them if they continue to believe as they believe. Presently, our public institutions are even laying the groundwork to justify violence against such “intolerant” views (not actions, views) because violence against such people is deemed legitimate as “their silence is violence,” their words are “hate speech,” and those certain words or views they espouse are “microaggressions” not just legitimate differences of opinions.[4] And Bible believing, Law/Gospel confessing, liturgical Christians are clearly labeled as the “they.”

Never mind that that Christian world view is foundational to the very freedoms that ALL Americans enjoy. Never mind that the proper differentiation of state and church, the proper limitation of the role of the State is a New Testament teaching, not a secular one and surely not an Islamic one. Never mind that the Bible’s message is that ALL humans are sinful, that every human heart must repent, and that changed lives can even begin to love one’s enemies not just one’s friends. Never mind, as Veith rightly says:

A Christian does not have some unique brand of morality; rather, what makes a Christian is the Gospel. Morality is for everyone. Protecting innocent life should be a foundational principle for all societies, of whatever religion or culture…. It is not our “morality” that defines Christians. This we share with other religions and many secularists. What defines Christians is our “faith.”[5]

Hey, that Charlie Kirk guy actually believed what I just said . . . and they executed him for it.

The violence will stop when we all as American citizens reject its root cause, the secular-statist-left’s demonization of law-abiding, God-fearing people, especially Christians “in the name of tolerance.” Otherwise, we’ll have to endure more of the same. Notice how even the clear motive for Kirk’s killing is now being explained away as “mental illness” or an “extreme but understandable” response to Kirk’s supposed intolerance when in reality it is clearly a motivation from a hatred that has been fomented by those who see the Christian worldview in general as a threat to their secular political intentions. The violence will stop when those who hold the secular-statist-political views (whether socialist or fascist) actually have to deal with the violence and death that their ideology has wrought.[6]

Reich stated the secularist “call to battle” plainly. Should Christians “fight back?” Isn’t this a “turn the other cheek moment” which may be necessary for sharing the Gospel? Isn’t our humility our greatest asset in these debates? Yes . . . and no. It is true that our proclamation of the truth is from the position of humility, not arrogance. It is true that our sharing of the faith is willing to endure all kinds of false caricatures and abuse. But, when it comes to the moral and ethical fundamentals of the society in which one lives, one should never abandon the battle for what that actual truth is. A two-kingdom (2KG) perspective helps us here. We can “fight” for the foundational, moral truths of God for the sake of the culture (God’s preserving work), even as we differentiate it from God’s saving work in Christ. So, when Reich speaks of those who owe their identity and allegiance to some higher authority we can “fight that back,” politically, ideologically because he is not just demeaning Christianity, but all who see the very moral structure of the world as a gift of God. We can even argue that the biblical worldview of humanity helped birth some of the greatest documents of freedom ever produced, the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution, without politicizing the Gospel. We can fight for the right to proclaim the whole counsel of God freely (religious liberty), all the while proclaiming the very unique message of the Church, the Gospel, good news of “grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone” as the supra-cultural, “beyond politics” good news that it is.

Pray for Charlie Kirk’s family, bring Charlie Kirk’s murderer to justice, establish just, temporal peace for all people, and let there be a free exchange of ideas in our culture so that freedom, both temporal and eternal, may endure. We have to fight for that, even as we serve others in Christ’s name. Two kingdom citizens know when and how to fight . . . and when and how to serve to be the blessing that God intends us to be in Christ for others.

The Rev. Dr. Gregory Seltz is the executive director of the Lutheran Center for Religious Liberty.

Be Informed
Complaints have been filed against a late-term abortionist. Learn more about this case with Dr. Michael New of the Charlotte Lozier Institute.

Be Equipped
LCMS member, The Federalist editor, and Fox News contributor Mollie Hemingway reflects on the faith and life of Charlie Kirk.

Be Encouraged
“You and I are made for life, abundant and everlasting. And this Gospel is made for all our neighbors, every genetic member of humanity.” –Rev. Michael Salemink, Lutherans For Life

[1] When October 7 happened almost two years ago, I thought that people would see the evil for what it was. Women were raped and beheaded, babies crushed to death, elderly people beaten and burden—all “live-streamed” back to homes in Gaza. Then 251 mostly civilians were taken captive. Surely all would see this as the evil it was, right? Many didn’t, as protests for Hamas started happening all around our country with Jewish students being harassed on elite campuses throughout the Northeast.

[2] Ramesh Ponnuru, “Robert Reich’s Religion Problem,” National Review Online, July 6, 2004.

[3] Those of us who are Christian would add that God’s love even compelled Him to redeem us as well. But for our temporal, common dignity, freedom, and civility, it is sufficient to acknowledge our allegiance to the higher authority who created us as His own.

[4] Presently, in Finland, Lutheran Bishop Johanna Pohjola and former political leader, Paivi Raisanen are being tried by the state for the Church’s views on Marriage and sexual practice. Though biblical, it is now seen as “hate speech.” Similar things are already happening here with people like Jack Phillips, Barronelle Stutzman, Coach Joe Kennedy, Lorie Smith—7 years fighting for her right to work?, Mark Houck – raided by the FBI at 6:45am for a crime he didn’t do . . . and many more.

[5] Veith, p. 101-102

[6] In an article in “Reason” magazine, “Data on Mass Murder by Government in the 20th Century,” David Kopel estimates the total deaths/murders to be 212 million. He says, “Communists killed the most, followed by Fascists.” https://reason.com/volokh/2022/11/09/data-on-mass-murder-by-government-in-the-20th-century/  And I would add that they are both “Statists” and the anti-dote to “leftwing or rightwing STATISM” is the constitutional limitation of government, the freedom of religion, and the freedom of the “Faith motivated, morally directed, self-governing” citizen.

See Also
Charlie Kirk’s Assassination: A Two Kingdom Call to Action
Charlie Kirk’s Assassination: A Two Kingdom Call to Action

As I’ve shared online, for the last few days I’ve been laboring to write a response to the political assassination of Charlie Kirk, trying to put words together that express a proper response to the shock and horror of the evil violence perpetrated against a Christian believer who understood the limitations of politics and the beautiful salvation message that only God could accomplish in Jesus. A person who was willing to dialogue and debate all comers in the hope of demonstrating the truth of what he said and believed. He was proud of the foundational principles of individual liberty, religious freedom, limited government, educational freedom/choice, and the importance of faith, family, freedom to live self-governed lives . . . and for that he was executed. That should truly shock us all to our core.

The Secret to a Joyous Marriage
The Secret to a Joyous Marriage

After finishing college at Seward, my wife Kathy and I served as lay missionaries in a remote Cree Indian village in Ontario, Canada. One day we decided we’d go for a snowmobile ride. I pulled the machine in front of our little shack. I glanced behind me to see Kathy hopping aboard, and I took off. I headed down the skidoo trail on the frozen lake on a bright clear, frigid day, chatting happily with my dear wife (or so I thought). I had made it nearly a half-mile before I realized that no one was talking back. Suddenly I did a hard double take and turned to see the empty seat right behind me. Looking back at the distant village, she was nowhere to be seen. Turns out I had taken off just as she straddled the seat, but before she’d sat down. . . . We laughed about it then, and still do to this very day.

Raising Children in an Age of Nothing
Raising Children in an Age of Nothing

It’s not a happy thing to read that so many of our countrymen are “nones,” belonging to no church and adhering to no way of paying homage to God. How do we raise children in a no-land, where their deepest beliefs will be met with what’s sometimes more discouraging than enmity, with the shrug of indifference and incomprehension?

I think we must bear in mind the character of this nothing. It is not deep — it cannot conceivably be deep — but it is broad, like a vast slick of muddy water and wreckage after a flood, shallow as a few inches in most places, but lapping at every post and foundation in sight.

The LCMS and Euthanasia
The LCMS and Euthanasia

At the 1995 synodical convention, the Synod delegates adopted resolution 6-02 titled "To Speak Out against Legalization of Assisted Suicide" (euthanasia) which reads as follows:

Whereas, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod affirms the sanctity of human life and recognizes the reality of human suffering; and

Whereas, Any attempt to legalize assisted suicide is an affront to the Lord, who gives life, and opens the door for abuse and future legislation that would deny the freedom of many; and

Things Worth Fighting For
Things Worth Fighting For

America is a gift. Rights are God given, based on the inherent dignity of man. The horrible theory of evolution undermines this truth. We are likewise told that rights are granted by earthly governments. But the created order is such that man bears the image of God, even fallen. This truth is seen already in an ultrasound. In a sense, these rights are negative. I do not have a right to take your property, but then, you have no right to take mine. A man may not be imprisoned except for compelling reasons. The family comes before the state, and therefore children belong not to the state, but to the father and mother. The right to bear arms is simply an extension of the truth that I have a right to defend my family and my home. No one is obligated to listen to me, but I have a right to free speech. No one is obligated to give me stuff, but I have the liberty to earn it.

Our Founding Fathers
Our Founding Fathers

Our Founding Fathers are indeed the fathers of all Americans. DEI taught us to despise them, to concentrate on their faults, to think of ourselves as somehow more enlightened. Critical theory is all about destruction, about seeing through something so that you can no longer see the thing itself. DEI is the philosophy of the scoff and sneer.

But as Americans, we do well to think on the God of providence and to celebrate this day with thanksgiving. Now, mind you, I honor all peoples as they sing their anthems, giving thanks for their own special heritage. But our heritage is a cornucopia, a legacy that we are called to live up to.

The Magdeburg Confession
The Magdeburg Confession

475 years ago, Magdeburg, Germany, was under siege by her own emperor, Charles V. It was the last Lutheran city remaining in Germany only four years after the death of Martin Luther. At issue was the preaching of the Gospel and the administration of the Sacraments. The highest authority in the land was demanding that the city churches re-institute Roman worship practices.

The city officers faced a difficult choice. Should they abandon the scriptural doctrine and practice restored by the Lutheran Reformation? Or should they take up arms against the God-ordained temporal authority? The pastors and theologians of the city penned the Magdeburg Confession to instruct the city councilmen of their God-given duty.

Two Kinds of Righteousness
Two Kinds of Righteousness

Two kinds of righteousness? I suppose, but not as it's often spoken about in our midst. There is civic righteous, which is to live in accordance with the natural law and may rightly describe the life of anyone, with or without Christ. Civil righteousness, reverence for life, for marriage, for the rights of property, and the like is a good thing. A Mormon may then live a life of civic righteousness, though he cannot be truly righteous or declared righteous.

 

We are told that the righteousness that comes from God is vertical and differs from all human righteousness. But such a notion needs to be challenged. The righteousness that we receive from God is, in fact, the righteousness lived on the horizontal plane. Many Christians think of righteousness as a gift from God that finds an opening in the cross of Christ. But that is misleading. The righteousness of God is, in fact, the righteousness of Christ, imputed to us because of Christ's active and passive obedience, even unto His death as a sacrifice for our sins. The likes of Forde and Paulson mislead, saying that Christ came forgiving, and for that He was murdered. By no means. Christ's forgiveness was made possible by the Father's sacrifice of His Son, as well as by Christ actually fulfilling, not putting an end to, the Law.

There’s No Debate
There’s No Debate

Recently, one among us complained that the LCMS has more often taken positions on the Republican side of things, with nothing from the Democrat agenda. I wonder if such complaints, from an opposite point of view, are made in the ELCA. What of it? Among the so-called Republican views cited were articles on being pro-life and warning against the rainbow revolution and the trans crisis. But these are not positions based on politics, though politics matter as a matter of justice and protection, but are essential to our humanity. Those who favor abortion, gay marriage, and the transgender agenda are in fact at war with the God of Genesis, the Author of creation. About such things there should be no debate among us, for to deny male/female, to deny the child in the womb is to deny Christ, who Himself lived in the womb of Mary, reiterated the truth of creation (Matthew 19, Mark 10) and came to be the groom for His bride, the Church.

When Satan Subverts Godly Government, the Church Cannot Be Silent
When Satan Subverts Godly Government, the Church Cannot Be Silent

English Statesman George Savile quipped, “Men are not hanged for stealing horses, but that horses would not be stolen.” With all that is happening in the world, his words concentrate our thoughts. Justice is not merely about trials and verdicts leading to punishment. It’s also about deterrence.

Through current events, many are relearning a seemingly long-forgotten factor relative to justice. As I watched the evening news with my wife, a segment came on about Venezuelan gang members being ordered back into the country after deportation. Without prompting, she asked, “What does it say when a federal judge orders the immediate return of violent criminals who’ve already been deported?”

Blessed Is the Fruit of Your Womb
Blessed Is the Fruit of Your Womb

The Bible is an earthy, fleshy book. God forms Adam from dirt. He fashions Eve from Adam’s rib. They eat forbidden fruit and use animal skin for covering. There are pillars of smoke and fire, roasted lambs and bitter herbs, bloody sacrifices and clouds of temple incense. And not only in the Old Testament — the New Testament continues with such physicality. Jesus heals with spit and dirt, fingers in ears, and caskets touched. A bloody cross culminates in bodily resurrection. Finally, He promises the resurrection of our bodies and a renewed physical earth.

Biblical salvation is not an offer to escape the body into some disembodied realm, whether platonic, gnostic, Eastern, transhumanist or anything else. Rather, the Bible deeply anchors redemption itself to the body. God carries out His redemptive deliverance through intense bodily realities from creation to consummation.

Assisted Suicide: No Lives Matter
Assisted Suicide: No Lives Matter

Make no mistake, legal suicide corrupts. Corrupts doctors who have taken an oath to do no harm. Corrupts a medical system that comes to think of patients as costs. Corrupts sacred bonds of a family, and the ties that bind generations. The fact that we are so willing to kill an unborn child, the fact that Obama, when in the Illinois legislature, would not even vote to ban partial-birth abortion should tell us something. The weak and the vulnerable are found at life's beginning and end and then everywhere in between. Where there is not right or wrong, there is only power; where life is not held as precious, it becomes cheap.

A Father Sacrifices His Son: Dads Matter
A Father Sacrifices His Son: Dads Matter

That's the story of salvation. We are given a glimpse in Abraham's willingness to put Isaac on the altar. In a worldly way, we see it when parents send their sons off to war. But what of those parents who say, "I just want my child to be happy"? I think we all get it, though that can't be the end all. There has to be something more. The writer to the Hebrews tells us that Abraham knew that Isaac would live again, would rise from the dead. But then, don't we?

Remembering the LRCL’s First Fourth of July in D.C.: Rejoicing Today!
Remembering the LRCL’s First Fourth of July in D.C.: Rejoicing Today!

It’s Friday, July 4th, 2025, in Washington D.C. and it has been an incredible journey. Our LCRL work started in 2017. From the start, our mission has been to bring a faithful two-kingdom voice into the heart of federal politics—a voice that limits the reach of government, defends the family and the Church, and upholds First Amendment freedoms so that God’s people can freely proclaim the whole counsel of God without fear of coercion or intervention to the contrary. For a time, threats like COVID shutdowns, the Obergefell decision, and the politicized coercion of DEI-LGBTQ mandates eroded those protections and weaponized government against those holding to traditional, biblical values.

The Oppressors and the Oppressed
The Oppressors and the Oppressed

That's how Marxism works. In the Communist Manifesto, it's the freeman and slave, the patrician and the plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman. Translated into the present, it's critical theory where it becomes a matter accumulating points. Score one for being a woman, one for being a person of color, one for being LGB, and perhaps two for being T. Count yourself as an enemy of the one percent, and that's at least a half-point. Such an odd thing, yet you gain a bit of oppressed status by including yourself among the 99 percent. Say you are an LGBTQ ally, another half point, and so on. Colleges have long operated this way, and many young people, young women especially, come home as trained Marxists.

Cohabitation Hurts More Than a Couple
Cohabitation Hurts More Than a Couple

If a couple came to me and said, “Pastor, we’d like to get married, and we’d like to do everything we can today to make sure our marriage ends in divorce tomorrow,” then I would tell them that the first thing they should do is move in together. Cohabitation is that destructive to marriage and family life.

However, the warning must not stop there. Because it is a form of public and intentional sin, cohabitation is particularly destructive to the conscience, and not just to the couple’s conscience but also to the conscience of the Christian community. Many couples view their choices as going no further than themselves. I would like to challenge this by considering some of the ways that cohabitation harms the broader Christian community.

Defund Planned Parenthood?
Defund Planned Parenthood?

That's the very least we can do. We have a lot of work to do. Blue states love abortion, want more of it, will never even speak against partial-birth abortion, much less children who, if born, could live outside of the womb. Red states are full of pro-life folks, many of whom would rather not push the issue. Abortion is the dark underside of our culture. What's a child in the womb worth? Nothing at all? Or is an unborn child dispensable? Is the child's worth totally dependent upon the mother? If a person is not loved, does that mean they can be dispensed with?

Compassionate Abortion?
Compassionate Abortion?

The story has many troubling aspects, not least of which is the parents’ decision based on inaccurate information about the child’s chance of surviving and thriving. But what troubles me most is that I encounter fellow Lutherans who have bought the narrative that it is better for babies with physical imperfections to be aborted rather than embraced and loved for whatever time the Lord allows them to live. I offer four problems with that mindset.

The Mob's Demonic Shrieks
The Mob's Demonic Shrieks

Abortion is a human right. So also is the right to ensure that children have puberty blockers and hormone treatment leading to mutilating surgery. Engage in debate, present the facts, and you will be shouted down by the mob. But that is a little child in the womb, a human being at an early stage. But you will hear only "My body, my choice." And if you take the argument further, you will hear more shouting, as the protestors screams and then repeats over and over again. What is a woman? There is no answer, but that doesn't bother the mob. Is there really such thing as a trans-child? How would you know? Might the child simply be confused? No answer, only the mantra, "Trans right are human rights."

A Lutheran Wedding
A Lutheran Wedding

There was a great wedding in Leipzig, Germany, in the mid-1730s. We don’t know whose wedding it was, and we wouldn’t think anything of it today at all, had not Johann Sebastian Bach composed a cantata for it. A cantata was a piece of concerted music, about 20 minutes long and split into various movements, made up of sung Scripture passages and poetic verses. Almost all of Bach’s cantatas end with a hymn stanza.

Think for a moment about which hymn stanza would best conclude a cantata at a wedding. What words should be echoing in the ears of bridegroom and bride as they prepare for married life together? Which would be best?

Created In God's Image
Created In God's Image

What does it mean that Adam was created in God's image? Surely this includes righteousness, as well as the ability to be in conversation with God. But then, the same could be said of angels, who are not said to bear that image. This image also looks forward to God's eternal intention to become one of us in His eternal Son, who is the express image of God.

Marriage: Human Construction or Divine Institution?
Marriage: Human Construction or Divine Institution?

Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) will go down in history as the landmark Supreme Court case which redefined marriage in this country, granting same-sex couples throughout the land the right to marry. Keen observers have noted, however, that nowhere in the opinion of the majority (written by Justice Kennedy) is marriage itself ever actually defined.

Jesus vs. Caesar
Jesus vs. Caesar

“Savior.” “Lord.” “Son of God.” If you asked someone in the ancient world who these titles referred to, they might tell you “Jesus.” But depending on who you were talking to, they might also tell you “Caesar.” Modern readers of the Bible often miss the fact that some of the language the New Testament uses to talk about Jesus was also commonly used to talk about the Roman Emperor, who was not just a political leader, but someone whom people worshipped and even offered sacrifices to.

SEEING THINGS FROM GOD’S “MISSION-VICTORY” POINT OF VIEW!
SEEING THINGS FROM GOD’S “MISSION-VICTORY” POINT OF VIEW!

D.C. We have seen religious liberties for Christians now protected and defended rather than threatened and litigated. We have seen other constitutional protections undergirded as well. But sadly, we are also seeing a growing callousness to the issue of life, not just from a select group of secular elites, but even from American citizens who are religious. The Pew Research Center shows that while conservative Christians still see abortion as an illegal action against innocent Children in the womb, other Christians are beginning to support the “abortion in all circumstances” mantra in pop culture.  The abortion euphemistic cover of a constitutional “right to choose” has been properly litigated, but now the deceptive phrases of “reproductive freedom” and “women’s health care” has many callously embracing the killing on demand of innocent children right up to the moment of birth. Politicians and citizens alike are growing in their support of the outrageous notion that a child can be aborted up to the time of birth and even after it is born, as long as the mother and the doctor decide.

Religious Liberty and Bearing the Cross: It’s Always to Share the Message of the Cross
Religious Liberty and Bearing the Cross: It’s Always to Share the Message of the Cross

A blessed Good Friday, Easter morning to you all!!

One of my favorite recurring guests on the “Liberty Action Alert” is Cal Thomas. He is a clear-thinking, fearlessly-engaging, Christian voice in the public square. His columns and commentary always give “public” Christians a lot to think about as they try to live out their faith lives in the particular vocations in the world in which they serve. He wrote this Good Friday piece about 3 years ago,

Sacrificial, Unconditional, Incarnational: A Biblical View of Marriage
Sacrificial, Unconditional, Incarnational: A Biblical View of Marriage

I recently began a wedding sermon addressing the couple, “Your marriage is going to be tough! It’s going to be filled with conflict and suffering and sorrow and pain. And, if you do it right, you’ll eventually get to watch each other get old, have more pain, carry more grief and watch each other move toward death.”

Their eyes got as big as saucers, and their huge smiles started to waver. I paused for a bit with a very serious look on my face, because it is all, sadly, true. I then continued, “However, you’re about to enter one of the most beautiful experiences you can ever have on earth. You’ll have glimpses of heaven that most will never see. You’ll delight in the love of Jesus overflowing to you from your spouse. When you fall, you’ll have each other to speak words of forgiveness and renewal. Your joy will grow and overflow to everyone. And I can say this with certainty.”

The Common Order of Christian Love
The Common Order of Christian Love

According to Luther’s teachings about the Christian life, the good works God desires of us are carried out in our vocations. That is to say, the Christian life does not necessarily involve heroic accomplishments and dramatic deeds. Rather, God calls us to love and serve our neighbors in our ordinary interactions with the members of our families, our coworkers and our fellow citizens.

Making the Case for Life
Making the Case for Life

It’s easy to talk about your pro-life beliefs with your Christian friends. You’re all coming from the same source: the Bible. But what happens when you chat with friends or teachers who aren’t Christian, who don’t see the Bible as anything at all? How can you stand up for life in a pro-choice world?

Don't Be Political
Don't Be Political

Don't speak against abortion, though it will undermine everything you say about the sanctity of life and the Incarnation, our Lord who made His life in the womb. Oh, and babies will be killed. Don't be political and speak the truth of marriage, though God gave it for the sake of all children, so that they might have a mom and dad. Whatever you do, don't get into the whole male and female debate. Let the confused kids fend for themselves. Don't go out of your way, like some Good Samaritan to help them. Don't stand in the way of the predator wielding the knife.

Being for the Family
Being for the Family

“What is marriage?” It seems like a silly question. But it’s one our society is vigorously fighting about. For thousands of years, and for all of recorded history prior to the year 2000, societies around the world recognized that marriage was an exclusive relationship of faithful permanence between one man and one woman, who vowed to remain together until death parts them.

However, in a matter of a few short years (in the scope of human history), the institution of marriage has gone from being exclusively defined between one man and one woman, to being debated by society (it’s now at the highest court in our land), to consider if it might also be applicable to two homosexual men or two homosexual women.

Dr. Gregory Seltz
Next

October Prayer Partner Thursday